"An Adult faith does not follow the waves of fashion and the latest novelties."
Pope Benedict XVI

Sunday, July 8, 2012

Restoring Tradition In Your Diocese -- Methods and Strategies

Elevation During The Tridentine (Exraordinary Form of the Roman Rite)
Missal of Pope John XXIII
THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: As we have now passed the fifth anniversary of Summorum Pontificum, and are quickly approaching the third anniversary of Anglicanorum Coetibus, it is clear the Catholic Church is steadily moving toward a restoration of tradition. However, the process is slow at times. This is especially true in liberal dioceses with stubborn bishops and priests. Often traditionally-minded Catholics complain in frustration and defeat in these situations. As I pointed out in a previous article, there is no need for a defeatist attitude.

First and foremost, let me make this perfectly clear. The spirit of defeat is outdated and obsolete. It is completely unnecessary now. You, as a Roman Catholic, living today, have much more available to you than you did just before 2007. If you're fortunate enough to live in the English-speaking world (Anglosphere), as of 2009, you actually have twice as many tools at your disposal than Catholics in non-English-speaking countries. A spirit of defeat is completely and totally unwarranted.

Before we get into it, allow me to define exactly what the problem is, what our goals should be, and the available tools at our disposal.

The Problem...
The real issue that plagues local parishes today is a general misunderstanding of the liturgical reforms called for by Vatican II and what was intended by the 1970 "Novus Ordo" Missal of Pope Paul VI. The general (albeit misguided) idea, motivating many people at that time, was to bring the mass down to the people in a folksy kind of way. It was believed (or misunderstood) that by "dumbing down" the mass to the lowest possible level, it would effectively make the liturgy more accessible and personable to the general public. It was in effect, the extreme opposite of a high Latin mass celebrated according to the 1962 "Tridentine" Missal of Pope John XXIII. Now while it is true, the Second Vatican Council and the "Novus Ordo" Missal of Pope Paul VI (1970), was intended to bring the mass closer to the people, there was nothing in the Council or the Missal, that called for "dumbing down" the mass. That was just how the general population interpreted it, and as a result, Western Catholics had to suffer everything from bad vernacular translations to banal celebrations that stripped the liturgy of her rich tradition, followed by church renovations that changed the look and feel of Catholic worship, ultimately leading to strange and bizarre liturgical abuses that were designed to "spice up" a bare-bones mass that had already been "dumbed down" by poor vernacular translations. I want to stress here, this is NOT what the Second Vatican Council intended, and this is NOT what Pope Paul VI intended when he promulgated his 1970 Roman Missal in its original Latin text. These things are the product of a huge misunderstanding, and in some cases intentional abuse, of what was meant to come out of the 1960s Catholic Church. The height of this wacky liturgical situation also happened to coincide with the worst period of clerical sex abuse during the late 1970s through early 1990s. What we are dealing with today is the residual effects of both, and thankfully, they are both on the decline.

Today, as of 2012, reports of clerical sex abuse are at their lowest levels since before the 1950s. The liturgical chaos is fading at a much slower pace, yet nevertheless, it is definitely on the decline. The English translation of the 1970 Missal has been vastly improved.  The Church is trending toward traditionalism, and the only thing slowing her down is stubborn clergy, who for whatever made-up reason, refuse to implement the pope's plan. Much of this is the result of a learning curve. The vast majority of people resistant to reform are simply ignorant. They are on the low end of the learning curve. They can change, but it's taking them longer to catch up with others. This can be especially problematic when this person happens to be a bishop. Granted, there are always people who are not ignorant, or creatures of habit, but are instead insistent on their own agenda which is anti-tradition (i.e. Modernist), but this is the exception, not the norm. The fast majority of problems out there are caused by people who perhaps should know better, but sadly and regrettably, they do not.

The Solution...
The solution of course is a simple one. We simply need to help local priests understand that the people crave tradition, but what makes this complicated is a good number of people don't know that yet. The ultimate goal is to start getting every priest celebrating the Novus Ordo mass the way it was intended to be -- with reverence, solemnity and awe, drawing upon the traditions of the past. This can be a challenge, but once this goal is obtained, in every parish of every diocese, the liturgical crisis in the Catholic Church will effectively be over. So how is this done? Well, simply going up to your local priest and asking for more solemnity and tradition probably won't work, even if he is a good man who means no harm but is genuinely ignorant. The problem is, he simply won't agree with you that that is what the people really want. Why? Because his experience tells him otherwise; starting from his seminary training to the voices of his parish council that have been telling him the opposite for the last two or three decades. No, to get the priests on board, we are going to have to get a sizable majority of Catholic laypeople exposed to tradition. That doesn't mean we have to make traditionalist out of them, far from it, we simply need to expose them to tradition, and in doing so, most of them will gain an appreciation for tradition, and this in turn will motivate local parish priests to sit up and take notice.

How do we do that? Simple. We have two tools at our disposal, given to us by Pope Benedict XVI himself.

The first is Summorum Pontificum and the second is Anglicanorum Coetibus. From Summorum Pontificum, Catholics gain the tools they need to force a return of the Traditional Latin Mass to their diocese. This would be the return of Latin Traditionalism. From Anglicanorum Coetibus, Catholics gain the tools they need to introduce the Traditional English Mass to their area. Between both the influences of Latin Traditionalism and English Traditionalism in any given diocese or region, it will cause two things to happen. The first is that two islands of safe refuge will be provided for those of a staunchly traditionalists mindset. The second is that regular Novus Ordo parishes will be forced to live in close proximity to these traditionalist communities, and in time will be forced to adopt some of their ways, lest they be perceived as "Modernist" and lose members because of it. So how do you go about doing this in your area?

The Strategy...
The way to reintroduce tradition to a diocese is either through Latin Traditionalism, or through English Traditionalism, but preferably through both. Both will effectively bring about change much faster, putting a tremendous amount of pressure on priests and bishops to bring traditional features back to their regular celebration of the Novus Ordo mass.

How To Restore Latin Traditionalism...
If your local bishop is not already hosting a Traditional Latin mass in your area, five years after Summorum Pontificum, then I'm afraid you're likely dealing with a very stubborn bishop. Here is what has likely been happening these last five years.

You see the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum, says the bishop only has to provide a Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) if there is a small but steady group of people asking for it. Problem is, when various indivuals ask for it individually, a stubborn bishop can sweep all of these individual requests under the rug and tell the Vatican there have been no "groups" in his diocese asking for the TLM, thus getting away with suppressing the TLM in his area on a manufactured technicality. So to get around this, Catholic individuals must themselves organise into a group on their own. UNA VOCE is probably the best organisation out there to help Catholics do this. Once you have a list of names, and you meet once a month in a home or library or something, UNA VOCE can help you together draft a group letter addressed to your bishop, bearing all your names and signatures, requesting a TLM, and then forward a copy of this to your bishop and Ecclesia Dei at the Vatican, letting the bishop know a copy was sent to Ecclesia Dei.  Now the bishop is under pressure from Rome, because Summorum Pontificum says he HAS TO provide a TLM if a "stable group" asks for it, and he can no longer hide the fact that such a group exists. Rome is now watching. If the bishop does not respond in the affirmative within a few months, your local group can now start writing to Ecclesia Dei directly and regularly (the squeaky wheel gets the oil) with the help and advice of UNA VOCE. If the bishop says he doesn't have the resources to provide, Ecclesia Dei will direct him to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (FSSP), or something similar, and advise him to use their resources to fix the problem ASAP, because after all, the bishop is now officially in violation of canon law. Rome now has legal justification to act in accordance on this issue. Checkmate! From this point, it will just be a matter of weeks to months before a TLM will be provided in this area.

How To Introduce English Traditionalism...
The process of introduction of the "Anglican Use of the Roman Rite" is a bit different than the restoration of the "Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite" otherwise known as the "Tridentine" Missal of Pope John XXIII. In restoring Latin Traditionalism, the process is to legally checkmate a stubborn bishop who for whatever reason has so far refused to implement the Holy Father's will in his diocese. In introducing English Traditionalism, the process is to effectively bypass a stubborn bishop all together, but not necessarily in any kind of adversarial way. To do this, the implementation of Anglicanorum Coetibus is required. How do you do this? Simple. Locate some Anglican converts to Catholicism in your diocese. Chances are you probably already know one or two. See if they are interested in seeing Anglcanorum Coetibus implemented in your area, and introducing the Anglican Use of the Roman Rite into the diocesen territory. In other words, ask them if they are tired of the Novus Ordo, and if they would like to bring in some Vatican approved, "high church" Anglicanism into their regular worship. Once you've found just one or two families interested in this, you're ready to go. The process will require those former Anglicans (now Catholics) to petition the regional Anglican ordinariate within the Catholic Church for membership. This can be done in the United States for example, by filling out this application form for individuals and families to the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of Saint Peter.

Once that is done, a group may be formed, and there are two ways of going about this. The group can be a "private group" or a "public group." If it is a "public group" you will need the blessing of your local diocesan bishop. If it's a "private group," meeting privately in somebody's home, then permission from the local bishop is not usually necessary. However, if you decide to go the "private group" way, you will be unable to get the word out to the general public though websites, advertisements, news articles and public listings. It is by nature a "private group" which means PRIVATE. Letting people know about it is spread by private invitation only. It is not necessary to have a large "public group" if one fears persecution by local diocesan officials. A "private group" will suffice to get the job done eventually. Just keep in mind, should you ever decide to go "public" before the ordinariate has accepted your membership applications, you will need permission from the local bishop.

Why create a group and have regular meetings (monthly, bi-weekly or weekly)? Because by doing this, it opens membership up to Catholics without an Anglican background. For example in the United States, on the ordinariate membership form for individuals and families, there is a provision for Catholics to join the ordinariate who are already members of an Anglican Use community. If you have a private or public group that is regularly meeting for Morning or Evening Prayer according to the Anglican Use "Book of Divine Worship" (download PDF here), you effectively have an Anglican Use community in operation. Membership in this community, may likely qualify such persons for membership in the ordinariate. When the ordinariate is ready to accept your group, and possibly supply it with a priest, they will be in contact and inform you what to do next. Be advised, this process can take several months to a few years, depending on your location and the availability of ordinariate priests.

Upon reception into the ordinariate, both you, and all the members of your group, will be transferred to the episcopal oversight of the Anglican Ordinary for your region. The local diocesan bishop will have no more power to persecute you. Henceforth, your group will be allowed to celebrate English Traditionalism to your heart's content.

Now please be advised; if you do not believe your diocesan bishop will attempt to persecute you or your group, please don't hesitate to at least write him a letter to let him know what you are doing. You might be surprised at his level of support! There is no sense undercutting a bishop who has done nothing to cause you to fear. He may not be a Traditionalist-friendly bishop, but that doesn't necessarily mean he is anti-Traditionalist either.  Remember, an Anglican ordinariate group can also be sold as an ecumenical outreach, under the banner of Vatican II.  That is after all, its primary purpose.  If you can help some traditionalist Anglican families, persecuted by their Episcopalian bishop, then you'll be doing a good service.  Chances are, you know your bishop better than I do.  You know his history and his likely tendencies. Only you can decide what to do in regards to this.

Conclusion...
We are not helpless victims of the liturgical crisis that currently plagues the Roman Rite of the Catholic Church. The Holy Fathers, both Pope Benedict XVI and John Paul II, together have given us the necessary tools we need to fight back in an orderly and lawful way. Please keep in mind, the enemy is NOT the Novus Ordo mass, but rather its systematic abuse.  If the Missal of Pope Paul VI is ever to be suppressed, that is a decision for Rome to make, not us.  Our goal is not to eliminate the Novus Ordo mass, but rather provoke its reform and subsequent renewal.  

12 comments:

Confederate Papist said...

I was an ardent "crush and destroy the Novus Ordo" type guy until I educated myself on Vat-II and realised that the document itself was not the problem, but the "queens" in the English speaking parts of the Church who used this as an opportunity to advance their Marxist, hippy and pro-homo agendas. I thank God daily for our continued reform and pray that it won't take forty years to get back where we should have been all along since the completion of Vat-II.

Anonymous said...

CK is right that most priests and parish councils don't even know what a good traditional mass is like and they just see it as another administrative difficultly that could further increase their workload. One solution is the outsourcing of the traditional mass to priests from traditional orders that go around to different parishes with the sole purpose of training the choir and conducting the TLM mass. In this way the regular parish priests are not burdened with more work (as some of them see it).

sth_txs said...

I've attended Catholic mass once in a while, but I can't see the value of a Latin mass.

I don't know Latin, and can't imagine getting much from it since I cannot understand it.

CatholicMom said...

I really enjoy your blog. I even got the Little House series for my 6 year old based on one of your past post recommendations. (We are having a blast reading them!) I had no idea what a TLM was 4 years ago, as I was just another cafeteria Catholic then. The TLM taught me what it truly meant to be Catholic. Now I get more out of Novus Ordo mass as well, but it is 100% due to attending FSSP/TLM services for ~ one year. I also only financially support either TLM or orthodox Novus Ordo parishes that do not carry on liturgical abuses - I think that is another way we can support and encourage Traditionalism. God Bless...

Antaine said...

Hahaha, this is pretty good Sir Knight. I wonder if I could get the Latin Mass in my parish. I know there are 2 churches in the area that both used to do 10 and 11 o'clock masses, but after an elderly priest left they decided to only do a 10 mass in one church and 11 in the other.

Sir Knight, if you wanted to write a letter to your priest asking them about the Latin Mass, do you suppose it would be okay to do so anonymously? Obviously if the anonymous letters yielded no results it would be time to make yourself known.

Paul said...

I attend (and love) the Novus Ordo mass -and don't like at all the many abuses i've seen even since i was an altar boy in the 70's (i won't even go into explanation because i am so grateful things are getting better). Thank God and His church authorities that some sanity has been coming back in recent years!

For example: a guy came to our parish about 6 years ago now from the east coast and a Latin liturgy at his former parish. He couldn't stand the fact that we had altar girls (like many of us who had been there for so long) and decided to begin to teach altar serving as it should be. Today, almost 7 years later, we have no altar girls and more altar boys that we ever had before. There is a system where the better servers rise in rank and authority on the altar. It's amazing! Also, some of these boys are now thinking of becoming priests...as a member of the Serra club i couldn't be happier about that if i was in heaven, i think.

And no girls want to serve anymore -if i was a boy today that is exactly as i would like it. So thank God indeed for this symbiotic relationship between these liturgies and i hope those who attend the Latin masses will heed your call toward renewal!

dolorosa said...

The Roman Rite before Vatican II was the Latin Tridentine Mass not the Novus Ordo (New Mass). Now we have two? Why? We were deceived into believing that one could no longer attend the Latin Mass. The Novus Ordo was everywhere. http://www.alteringliturgy.com/
Vatican II contains errors such as telling the Jews they don't have to convert and are still awaiting their Messiah. This is wrong! http://www.sspx.org/sspx_faqs/q6_vatican_ii.htm

ssxp said...

If we read through history and look at the lifes of the Saints a pattern imerges wether it be he ups and downs of the church or a stregthining of the faith. If we read about the founders of the relgious orders its seems as if they all had something to do with some kind of reform in the church. We should ask ourselves what was going on in the church that this was necesary. If we read about the trial of St. Joan of arc we can see how anybody can be influeced by politacal power. We might also see a pattern a Frankish King restored. A Frakish Monarch to come a hundred year war resolved. A hundred year chaisisment the reocurence of certain dates in the lives of saints.
Sorry i have gotten of point.
But what do we see from this within the church a return to piety. Without the reform of politics do to the maryterdom of chritians through out history.

ssxp said...

I appologize i forgot to mention what happened durring ww2 between the Vatican and Hitler. Could this be one of the things refered to At Fatima the surfering of the Pontiff
Also i belive we have a tendacy today to look at history in a modern tone. If we concider how long it takes for information to travel in days past and then ask ourselves where the Fatima prophecys what have had the most inpact within the first decade what would we see personaly first in Por,and Spain,Rome,France. South America and Mexico.
Also if we concider the time line and how fast the prohecys would have spred through the spanish speaking nations and look at a map and concider the location of Por. and how central it is within those nation we could ask ourselves how did the news effect the Catholics in Mexico at the time and how fast did it spred north up the west coast. Did we in America no about it before or after the depression .

ssxp said...

If anyone were to consider how the host should be treated, and then view on EWTN how the host is treated in the mass and then consider how many atoms of the host are scattered across the alter or in sombodys hand if they were to recive the commuion in their hand, and then consider that in a properlly performed traditional Mass the Preist continually keeps his thumb and forefinger together after the handling of the host, we could ask ourselves can we see the difference in the reverence in which the host is handled? I would hope that anybody who has ever seen a properly performed Mass would see the difference.

BehindandBeforeme said...

UK Catholic offers the following information extracted from the Fatima Prayer book –
“There is only one sacrifice in the universal church. It is a continuation of the sacrifice of Calvary and it is called the mass. There are over 20 authorised ways to celebrate the mass. These ways or liturgies are called Rites. The Rite used in most of the western world is called the Roman or Latin Rite which evolved from the liturgy of the early church, was codified in the 16th century at the council of Trent (a city in northern Italy) and takes its popular name, Tridentine (from the Latin version of that city Tridentum).
Four hundred years later another council, Vatican 11, altered this liturgical form and called the alteration the Novo Ordos, the new order, which is the form most of us are familiar with. The Novo Ordos is not a new Rite but rather, as Pope Benedict XVI explains in his letter Summorum Pontificum (July 2007), an alternative usage of the one Roman Rite.
The Tridentine form of the Rite is also referred to as the Traditional form, the Extraordinary form, or the Mass of the Roman Missal published by Pope John XXIII in 1962; the Novo Ordo is sometimes referred to as the Mass promulgated by Pope Paul VI in 1970.”
As Pope Benedict XVI’s Summorum Pontificum encourages the general use of both usages of the Rite, I would strongly recommend that readers of this blog get hold of the “Fatima Prayer Book”. It offers.....” an abbreviation of the older form to give readers access to the responses and be able to follow it should they find it being celebrated. Low Mass is the term used for the “everyday” form as opposed to High Mass which is the more ceremonial form with deacons, sub-deacons, incense and sung sections”.

BehindandBeforeme said...

To ponder on what we mean by tradition may I proffer the following extract from Doorway to Faith (published by the Holy See) –
“Catholics practise their faith in a distinctive way as a result of the teaching concerning the transmission of divine revelation. We not only reverence the scriptures but also treasure other aspects of the Church’s life because they make up what we call tradition. We are speaking here about the teachings that come to us through the church (e.g. papal teaching, the Catechism etc), and about the liturgy and the sacraments, the witness of the lives of the Apostles and the lives of the saints. Together these two modes of transmission - Scripture and Tradition – form a great unity. “......
Please note that tradition as the church defines it is not limited to the form the mass takes. It extends out to include a host of other variables as outlined above. (veneration of Our Lady, the rosary, venerating the saints, study of the catechism etc).These other parts of the churches tradition are totally in the control of the laity and the renewal of the church will be jump started by the laity getting to know their faith better through the Catechism , saying the rosary together etc. There is nothing to stop you from doing all this today...you don’t need your bishops permission to meet and study the catechism or say the rosary .Start with the things you can do as part of your strategy - and then the rest will follow as your personal and collective faith grows stronger.
I also strongly recommend the new book YOUCAT (Youth Catechism of the Catholic Church) .Its approved by the pope and can be obtained from the CTS (Catholic Truth Society). Adults read it too - as we have all missed out on this wonderful source of instruction in our own faith. To jump start renewal of the faith in the USA please read the Catechism, say the rosary daily and also go to Aid for the Church in need website to buy the CDs of Dr Scott Hahn. This man is a genius of Catholic theology.Like you CK and American Convert.
As a final note I would caution about adopting “Anglican tradition/English Traditionalism” as a blanket model for renewal of the US church. It is not equivalent to our own Catholic tradition unless it is from those parts of the Anglican Church that have recently come over to the Catholic Church and are papal approved. As a resident of the UK I am keenly aware that the blanket terms (Anglican/English Traditionalism) can encompass a host of Anglican/English traditions that would horrify you CK. I think it’s safer to stick to the clear traditions of our own mother church plus those of any papal approved Anglican Ordinaraites you wish to reference. To quote Dr Edward Norman, the historian and former Canon Chancellor of York Minister, who was received into the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham in October 2012 - Dr Norman explains the reasons for his decision to become a Catholic. He argues that Anglicanism has “no basis for its authority”, as its confession “varies from place to place and person to person”. He says:“At the centre of Anglicanism is a great void.”He adds: “The Church of England provides a masterclass in equivocation; it also, however, is the residence of very many good and faithful Christian people who deserve respect – for their perseverance in so many incoherent spiritual adventures. To leave their company is a wrench; to adhere to the Catholic faith is to join the encompassing presence of a universal body of believers in whose guardianship are the materials of authentic spiritual understanding… I have immense gratitude.”.............
be careful about following any unapproved Anglican/English traditionalism. Travel hopefully USA , and Im glad to see that Obama has finally forced you to put God before politics and country.......God moves in mysterious ways...........